📘 Overview of xSeek
👉 Summary
Search behavior is shifting: many users now rely on answer engines and assistants to get direct responses instead of clicking through blue links. For brands, this creates a new visibility challenge—being cited accurately, showing up in recommendations, and understanding why competitors become “the answer” while others disappear. As a result, teams are adding new metrics beyond classic rankings to measure presence inside AI-generated answers. xSeek sits in this emerging discipline, often described as Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) or Generative Engine Optimization (GEO). The goal is to make AI-answer visibility measurable and repeatable: track strategic prompts, observe citations and sources, compare share of voice against competitors, and prioritize actions that improve your likelihood of appearing. In this overview, we explain what xSeek is, how it works, the features that matter most, and the best use cases for marketing teams and agencies. We also cover what to expect in terms of method, adoption effort, and budget when you move from traditional SEO to AEO/GEO workflows.
💡 What is xSeek?
xSeek is an AEO/GEO optimization platform designed to help companies increase their visibility inside AI-generated answers. It lets teams track market prompts, see whether their brand is cited, identify the sources and pages AI uses, and turn those insights into concrete content and technical improvements. Unlike classic SEO tools that focus on SERP positions, xSeek focuses on answers: presence, citation frequency, share of voice, and which pages are actually referenced. This helps teams understand what AI systems “read” and how their content competes in answer environments. xSeek provides dashboards and actionable recommendations so AEO/GEO can become a routine: select prompts, measure performance, run repeatable tests, implement improvements, and monitor impact over time across engines and competitors.
🧩 Key features
Prompt monitoring: build strategic prompt sets (informational, commercial, competitive) to measure brand presence in AI answers. Citation analysis: identify sources and citations, highlight which pages are used, and spot opportunities to strengthen key pages. Share of voice and competition: compare visibility across brands, track winners by topic, and detect coverage losses. Multi-run testing: run repeated queries to reduce noise and reveal more reliable trends. Dashboards and reporting: summary views by prompt, topic, engine, and time period for consistent monitoring. Recommendations: actionable guidance for content gaps, structure improvements, and technical accessibility that supports AI crawling. Agency workflows: multi-client views, competitive tracking, and reporting capabilities depending on plan and tier.
🚀 Use cases
AI visibility KPIs: track buyer-like prompts and measure whether your brand is cited, with dashboards suitable for marketing reporting. Answer-driven content strategy: identify topics where you don’t appear, then create or strengthen pages that have higher citation potential. Competitive analysis: understand why a competitor is mentioned more often, for which prompts, and with which sources. Key page optimization: detect which pages are “read” and improve clarity, structure, evidence, and relevance. Agency reporting: deliver AEO/GEO monitoring for clients, show share-of-voice movement, and prioritize a structured optimization backlog. Change detection: spot visibility shifts that may reflect engine behavior changes or market competition movements.
🤝 Benefits
Measurable AEO/GEO: track citations and share of voice instead of relying on intuition. Better prioritization: focus on pages and topics that can move AI-answer visibility. Clear competitive view: share of voice makes the landscape easier to interpret. Time savings: automated dashboards replace manual spot-checking. More reliable signals: multi-run testing reduces variability noise. Marketing/SEO alignment: connect content, technical improvements, and performance outcomes in one workflow.
💰 Pricing
xSeek uses tiered pricing for marketing teams and agencies. Entry plans are listed around $99.99/month, typically with limits on prompts, engines, and the number of sites monitored. Higher tiers expand coverage, add reporting features, competitive tracking, and—depending on plan—options like integrations or API access. A 7-day free trial helps validate fit: set up prompt sets, review share of voice, analyze citations, and test a few optimization actions. Choosing a plan depends on scope. A small team can start with entry coverage, while agencies and multi-brand teams usually need more prompts, more competitors, and broader engine monitoring to support consistent reporting and iteration.
📌 Conclusion
xSeek is a strong option for teams taking AI-answer visibility seriously. By providing citation metrics, share of voice dashboards, and actionable recommendations, it helps turn AEO/GEO from a vague concept into an operational program. It works best for teams with an existing SEO/content baseline and the capacity to iterate—because the value comes from converting insights into concrete improvements. For sites without foundational content or technical SEO, impact will be limited. If your objective is to become a brand that AI engines cite and recommend, and you want to manage that with clear KPIs and repeatable workflows, xSeek is a solid candidate for your stack.
